Close Lucintel Chat
Didn't Find What You're Looking for?
Call us at +1972 636 5056 or write at helpdesk@Lucintel.com
Ask an Expert Provide Custom Requirements Download Sample Report Search Available Reports
  • helpdesk@Lucintel.com
  • |
  • Call Lucintel +1 972 636 5056
  • |
  • Login
  • |
  • Register
  • |
  • Search
  • |
'
...

The Impact of COVID-19 is included in Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Report. Buy it today to get an advantage.

Request the impact of COVID-19 on your product or industry


Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Trends and Forecast

The future of the global minimally invasive fascial closure device market looks promising with opportunities in the general hospital, specialized hospital, and clinic markets. The global minimally invasive fascial closure device market is expected to grow with a CAGR of 6.7% from 2025 to 2031. The major drivers for this market are the rising demand for minimally invasive surgical procedures, the growing awareness about reduced complications with advanced closure devices, and the increasing investments in healthcare infrastructure.

• Lucintel forecasts that, within the type category, winged structure is expected to witness higher growth over the forecast period.
• Within the application category, general hospital is expected to witness the highest growth.
• In terms of region, North America is expected to witness the highest growth over the forecast period.
Gain valuable insights for your business decisions with our comprehensive 150+ page report. Sample figures with some insights are shown below.

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Trends and Forecast

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Segment

Emerging Trends in the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

The minimally invasive fascial closure device market is observing some of the key emerging trends aimed at enhancing surgical results, improving the experience of the users, and broadening the uses of the device.
• Widespread Use of Barbed Sutures: An important trend that is gaining momentum is the more general use of barbed sutures for minimally invasive fascial closure. Barbed sutures have small barbs along their length that grab hold in the tissue, thus minimizing or eliminating the need to tie knots and potentially generating more secure and consistent strength of closure. The result is less procedure time, easier surgical techniques, and perhaps a reduced risk of knot-related complications.
• Design of Optimized Absorbable Sutures: There is increasing emphasis on designing absorbable sutures with optimized degradation profiles that will offer sufficient tissue support during the important healing period and then progressively dissolve without inducing long-term inflammation or foreign body responses. The effect is better tissue healing, lower risk of chronic pain or complications from permanent sutures, and possibly enhanced cosmetic results.
• Incorporation of Ergonomic and Hand-Friendly Device Designs: Suppliers are focusing more on ergonomic design of fascial closure devices to increase surgeon comfort, make the device more maneuverable, and allow for accurate suture placement via small incisions. Single-handing ability and clear visual cues are becoming increasingly prevalent. The result is enhanced surgeon dexterity, less fatigue, and more efficient and accurate fascial closure.
• Advances in Suture Delivery Mechanisms: Improvements in suture delivery mechanisms are developing into devices that enable controlled and reproducible suture passage through fascial planes with minimal trauma to tissue. Included among these advances are devices with articulating tips and fine deployment systems. The effect is more precise suture placement, decreased risk of needle stick injuries, and possibly enhanced closure strength and integrity.
• Broadening of Use Outside General Surgery: Although starting with general surgery, use of minimally invasive fascial closure devices is broadening to other surgical disciplines, such as gynecology, urology, and bariatric surgery, where minimally invasive techniques are becoming more widespread. The result is wider market penetration and the potential to enhance fascial closure results across a broader spectrum of surgical procedures.
These new trends are transforming the minimally invasive fascial closure device market by promoting innovation towards more effective, safe, biocompatible, and easy-to-use solutions. The emphasis on barbed sutures, optimized absorbable devices, ergonomic designs, cutting-edge suture delivery, and enhanced applications is likely to result in improved surgical outcomes and wider adoption of these devices.
Emerging Trends in the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

Recent Development in the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

The minimally invasive fascial closure device market is witnessing ongoing innovations that are directed towards enhancing the safety and effectiveness of fascial defect closure resulting from minimally invasive surgeries. New developments have centered on simplifying the use for surgeons, achieving more secure and consistent closure, and lowering the rate of post-surgical complications such as incisional hernias. These innovations are leading to improved outcomes for patients and greater utilization of minimally invasive methods.
• Development of Improved Barbed Sutures: Of particular note in recent times is the development of barbed sutures with enhanced barb design and distribution. These have better tissue anchoring and no need for knotting, making closure easier and perhaps minimizing the risk of failure due to knots. The effect is more rapid and secure fascial closure with fewer chances of complications.
• Ergonomic Suture Delivery Device Introduction: Companies are looking to design more ergonomic and easier-to-use suture delivery devices tailored for minimally invasive surgery. These devices provide improved maneuverability, accurate placement of sutures, and single-handed operation in many cases, maximizing surgeon comfort and speed during fascial closure.
• Advances in Absorbable Suture Materials: New developments have added absorbable suture materials with optimized degradation profiles to their roster. These sutures are strong enough throughout the vulnerable healing phase and then break down uniformly, reducing long-term tissue reaction and the possibility of chronic pain. This results in better tissue healing and patient comfort.
• Combination of Imaging Guidance with Closures Devices: A few upcoming devices are being developed with capabilities for enhanced visualization and guidance within the process of fascial closure under minimally invasive procedures, possibly combinable with laparoscopic or endoscopic imaging technology. Improved visualization enhances precision and lessens the risk of accidental injury to the tissue.
• Device Portfolio Expansion across Different Incision Sizes: In light of the diversity of incision sizes in minimally invasive surgery, companies are increasing their portfolios to provide a diversified set of fascial closure devices with different sizes suited for different incision lengths and body locations. This way, surgeons can have the right device for a variety of procedures, resulting in more efficient closure.
These new advancements are having a great influence on the minimally invasive fascial closure device market by giving surgeons more effective, secure, and easy-to-use instruments for fascial closure. The innovations in barbed sutures, ergonomic delivery systems, biocompatible materials, imaging-assisted guidance, and portfolio development of devices are leading to better surgical outcomes and enhanced confidence in minimally invasive surgery.

Strategic Growth Opportunities in the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

The minimally invasive fascial closure device market offers several strategic opportunities for growth by targeting the growing use of minimally invasive surgery in most areas of medicine. The requirement for safe and effective fascial closure after such procedures is crucial to avoid complications. By targeting specific surgical uses, the manufacturers can customize their products and marketing efforts to gain market share and enhance patient outcomes.
• Laparoscopic General Surgery: One major growth area exists in the widespread adoption of sophisticated fascial closure devices in laparoscopic general surgical procedures, including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. The need for safe closure with minimal incision to avoid incisional hernias is a major driver in this high-volume surgery area.
• Gynecological Laparoscopy: Growth opportunity from the rising adoption of minimally invasive procedures for gynecological operations, such as hysterectomy and cystectomy, that would be an ideal market for specialized fascial closure devices, methodology, and anatomy-specific considerations.
• Bariatric Surgery: As the incidence of obesity increases and more laparoscopic bariatric procedures are being performed, there has been a resultant increased demand for strong and reliable fascial closure devices to deal with the potentially greater abdominal wall defects that occur in such cases as well as prevent hernias.
• Urological Laparoscopy and Robotics: Facilitated by the growing use of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in urology, nephrectomy, and prostatectomy represent an opportunity for growth and development of minimally invasive fascial closure devices compatible with these new surgical platforms.
• Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS): The move toward single-incision laparoscopic surgery, although technically demanding, presents a particular opportunity for new fascial closure devices capable of effectively closing the single, generally larger incision necessary for this technique and reducing the risk of hernia formation.
These strategic growth prospects are affecting the minimally invasive fascial closure device market by promoting the creation of specialized devices and methods designed for the distinctive needs of various minimally invasive surgical procedures. By concentrating on laparoscopic general surgery, gynecological laparoscopy, bariatric surgery, urological minimally invasive surgery, and SILS, producers can target particular clinical demands and facilitate market development.

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Driver and Challenges

The minimally invasive fascial closure device market is shaped by an interactive dynamic of technological progress, economic factors, and changing regulatory environments. Technological advances are driving closure devices that are more efficient and easier to use. Economic considerations, like the cost of healthcare and reimbursement policies, influence the uptake of these devices. Regulatory environments control the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Identifying these drivers and challenges is important for the stakeholders to operate in the market in the right manner and take opportunities for growth while resolving possible hindrances.
The factors responsible for driving the minimally invasive fascial closure device market include:
1. Growth in Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery: The key driver for this market is the increasing demand for minimally invasive surgical procedures across specialties because of their advantages of smaller wounds, lower pain, and quicker recovery, thereby fueling the demand for efficient fascial closure devices.
2. Increasing Awareness of Post-Operative Incisional Hernias: The high morbidity and cost of post-operative incisional hernias are prompting the need for improved fascial closure methods in minimally invasive surgery to prevent the development of this complication.
3. Technological Improvements in Suture Material and Delivery Instruments: Ongoing innovation in suture material, including barbed sutures and biodegradable materials with tailored degradation rates, and refinement of more ergonomic and accurate suture delivery instruments are foremost drivers improving the efficacy and ease of use of fascial closure devices.
4. Increasing Geriatric Population and Existence of Comorbidities: With the rising population of elderly patients and those with comorbidities, who tend to gain most from minimally invasive surgery, the need for successful fascial closure to reduce the incidence of post-operative complications in such a riskier population keeps on increasing.
5. Cost Reduction and Better Patient Outcomes: More and more healthcare systems are dedicated to cost reduction and better patient outcomes. Minimally invasive fascial closure devices help achieve this by potentially reducing the risk of incisional hernias and minimizing the demand for expensive revision surgeries.
Challenges in the minimally invasive fascial closure device market are:
1. Cost Limitations and Reimbursement Pressures: The expense of advanced fascial closure products can pose a barrier to uptake, especially where there are price-sensitive markets or healthcare systems with reimbursement pressures for surgical interventions.
2. Technical Complexity and SurgeonsÄX%$%X Learning Curve: Proper utilization of certain minimally invasive fascial closure products might call for certain training and knowledge, thus posing a learning curve for surgeons and impacting their adoption.
3. Inadequate Strong Long-Term Clinical Data: Though short-term advantages are perceived, more stringent long-term clinical data showing the superiority of certain minimally invasive fascial closure devices in lowering incisional hernias needs to occur in order to move forward with broader adoption.
The Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device market is greatly influenced by the rising demand for minimally invasive surgery, increasing awareness of incisional hernias, advancements in technology, the aging population, and cost containment and outcome focus. Cost challenges, technical difficulties, and demands for additional long-term clinical data must be overcome to ensure further growth in the market.

List of Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Companies

Companies in the market compete on the basis of product quality offered. Major players in this market focus on expanding their manufacturing facilities, R&D investments, infrastructural development, and leverage integration opportunities across the value chain. With these strategies minimally invasive fascial closure device companies cater increasing demand, ensure competitive effectiveness, develop innovative products & technologies, reduce production costs, and expand their customer base. Some of the minimally invasive fascial closure device companies profiled in this report include-
• Teleflex Medical
• Medtronic
• CooperSurgical
• B. Braun
• Golden Stapler
• Pride Medical Equipment
• Double Medical Technology
• Jiangsu Anno
• Dongfeng Yihe
• Portoria Medical

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Segment

The study includes a forecast for the global minimally invasive fascial closure device market by type, application, and region.

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Type [Value from 2019 to 2031]:


• Winged Structure
• Shield Structure

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Application [Value from 2019 to 2031]:


• General Hospitals
• Specialized Hospital
• Clinic
• Others

Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Region [Value from 2019 to 2031]:


• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• The Rest of the World

Country Wise Outlook for the Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

Recent trends in the minimally invasive fascial closure device market indicate an overall trend of minimizing post-surgery complications like incisional hernias and maximizing patient recovery from minimally invasive surgery. Developments are concentrated towards the creation of devices capable of providing safe and effective closure of fascial tissues through minimal incisions. These developments range from the introduction of new suture delivery systems, barbed sutures with increased tissue buy, and absorbable materials optimized for healing. Expanded use of minimally invasive surgery in diversified specialties remains the major driver for this market, with regional differences dictated by healthcare infrastructure, surgeon bias, and regulatory environments. This background lays the foundation to discuss certain developments in the United States, China, Germany, India, and Japan.
• United States: The US market for Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Devices is highly focused on cutting-edge technology and high-end products. New developments include the introduction of ergonomic device designs for smooth handling and accurate suture placement. The interest in barbed sutures, where knot tying is avoided, is also increasing, showing a potential for faster procedure times as well as enhanced closure strength. Regulatory frameworks allow the use of innovative closure devices.
• China: ChinaÄX%$%Xs minimally invasive fascial closure device market is growing rapidly, fueled by the rising volume of minimally invasive procedures and increased emphasis on patient outcomes. Recent trends include the increasing presence of locally developed manufacturers that provide cheaper but valuable closure devices. Although new technologies are being accepted, cost-effectiveness is still a key factor driving the market. Government programs that support the adoption of minimally invasive surgery are enhancing growth in the market.
• Germany: The minimally invasive fascial closure device market in Germany is characterized by a strong desire for high-quality, reliable devices that are highly valued for their safety and efficacy, given the well-established healthcare environment. New developments include the release of devices with more effective suture anchoring mechanism and absorbable sutures that are intended to integrate with the tissue optimally. Ergonomic designs are also emphasized for comfort and accuracy during surgery. High product quality is also guaranteed through regulatory standards.
• India: IndiaÄX%$%Xs minimally invasive fascial closure device market is slowly growing with increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical procedures in major hospitals and an enhancing popularity of secure fascial closure. Recent growth has consisted of the availability of more affordable closure devices and wider availability of barbed sutures. Surgeon training programs on how to properly utilize these devices are also on the rise.
• Japan: JapanÄX%$%Xs minimally invasive fascial closure device market is defined by attention to precision, safety, and patient comfort, consistent with the nationÄX%$%Xs high standard healthcare system and scrupulous surgical techniques. Developments have included bringing in devices equipped with fine suture delivery systems and absorbable sutures formulated with a purpose to reduce tissue reaction. Ease of use is also given emphasis along with ergonomic designs for surgeons. There are supportive regulatory pathways for surgeons to adopt high-standard closure technologies.
Lucintel Analytics Dashboard

Features of the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market

Market Size Estimates: Minimally invasive fascial closure device market size estimation in terms of value ($B).
Trend and Forecast Analysis: Market trends (2019 to 2024) and forecast (2025 to 2031) by various segments and regions.
Segmentation Analysis: Minimally invasive fascial closure device market size by type, application, and region in terms of value ($B).
Regional Analysis: Minimally invasive fascial closure device market breakdown by North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Rest of the World.
Growth Opportunities: Analysis of growth opportunities in different types, applications, and regions for the minimally invasive fascial closure device market.
Strategic Analysis: This includes M&A, new product development, and competitive landscape of the minimally invasive fascial closure device market.
Analysis of competitive intensity of the industry based on Porter’s Five Forces model.

Lucintel Consulting Services

FAQ

Q1. What is the growth forecast for minimally invasive fascial closure device market?
Answer: The global minimally invasive fascial closure device market is expected to grow with a CAGR of 6.7% from 2025 to 2031.
Q2. What are the major drivers influencing the growth of the minimally invasive fascial closure device market?
Answer: The major drivers for this market are the rising demand for minimally invasive surgical procedures, the growing awareness about reduced complications with advanced closure devices, and the increasing investments in healthcare infrastructure.
Q3. What are the major segments for minimally invasive fascial closure device market?
Answer: The future of the minimally invasive fascial closure device market looks promising with opportunities in the general hospital, specialized hospital, and clinic markets.
Q4. Who are the key minimally invasive fascial closure device market companies?
Answer: Some of the key minimally invasive fascial closure device companies are as follows:
• Teleflex Medical
• Medtronic
• CooperSurgical
• B. Braun
• Golden Stapler
• Pride Medical Equipment
• Double Medical Technology
• Jiangsu Anno
• Dongfeng Yihe
• Portoria Medical
Q5. Which minimally invasive fascial closure device market segment will be the largest in future?
Answer: Lucintel forecasts that, within the type category, winged structure is expected to witness higher growth over the forecast period.
Q6. In minimally invasive fascial closure device market, which region is expected to be the largest in next 5 years?
Answer: In terms of region, North America is expected to witness the highest growth over the forecast period.
Q7. Do we receive customization in this report?
Answer: Yes, Lucintel provides 10% customization without any additional cost.

This report answers following 11 key questions:

Q.1. What are some of the most promising, high-growth opportunities for the minimally invasive fascial closure device market by type (winged structure and shield structure), application (general hospitals, specialized hospital, clinic, and others), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World)?
Q.2. Which segments will grow at a faster pace and why?
Q.3. Which region will grow at a faster pace and why?
Q.4. What are the key factors affecting market dynamics? What are the key challenges and business risks in this market?
Q.5. What are the business risks and competitive threats in this market?
Q.6. What are the emerging trends in this market and the reasons behind them?
Q.7. What are some of the changing demands of customers in the market?
Q.8. What are the new developments in the market? Which companies are leading these developments?
Q.9. Who are the major players in this market? What strategic initiatives are key players pursuing for business growth?
Q.10. What are some of the competing products in this market and how big of a threat do they pose for loss of market share by material or product substitution?
Q.11. What M&A activity has occurred in the last 5 years and what has its impact been on the industry?

For any questions related to Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Size, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Growth, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Analysis, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Report, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Share, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Trends, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Forecast, Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Companies, write Lucintel analyst at email: helpdesk@lucintel.com. We will be glad to get back to you soon.
                                                            Table of Contents

            1. Executive Summary

            2. Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market : Market Dynamics
                        2.1: Introduction, Background, and Classifications
                        2.2: Supply Chain
                        2.3: Industry Drivers and Challenges

            3. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis from 2019 to 2031
                        3.1. Macroeconomic Trends (2019-2024) and Forecast (2025-2031)
                        3.2. Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Trends (2019-2024) and Forecast (2025-2031)
                        3.3: Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Type
                                    3.3.1: Winged Structure
                                    3.3.2: Shield Structure
                        3.4: Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Application
                                    3.4.1: General Hospitals
                                    3.4.2: Specialized Hospital
                                    3.4.3: Clinic
                                    3.4.4: Others

            4. Market Trends and Forecast Analysis by Region from 2019 to 2031
                        4.1: Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Region
                        4.2: North American Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    4.2.1: North American Market by Type: Winged Structure and Shield Structure
                                    4.2.2: North American Market by Application: General Hospitals, Specialized Hospital, Clinic, and Others
                        4.3: European Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    4.3.1: European Market by Type: Winged Structure and Shield Structure
                                    4.3.2: European Market by Application: General Hospitals, Specialized Hospital, Clinic, and Others
                        4.4: APAC Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    4.4.1: APAC Market by Type: Winged Structure and Shield Structure
                                    4.4.2: APAC Market by Application: General Hospitals, Specialized Hospital, Clinic, and Others
                        4.5: ROW Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    4.5.1: ROW Market by Type: Winged Structure and Shield Structure
                                    4.5.2: ROW Market by Application: General Hospitals, Specialized Hospital, Clinic, and Others

            5. Competitor Analysis
                        5.1: Product Portfolio Analysis
                        5.2: Operational Integration
                        5.3: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

            6. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Analysis
                        6.1: Growth Opportunity Analysis
                                    6.1.1: Growth Opportunities for the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Type
                                    6.1.2: Growth Opportunities for the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Application
                                    6.1.3: Growth Opportunities for the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market by Region
                        6.2: Emerging Trends in the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                        6.3: Strategic Analysis
                                    6.3.1: New Product Development
                                    6.3.2: Capacity Expansion of the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    6.3.3: Mergers, Acquisitions, and Joint Ventures in the Global Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market
                                    6.3.4: Certification and Licensing

            7. Company Profiles of Leading Players
                        7.1: Teleflex Medical
                        7.2: Medtronic
                        7.3: CooperSurgical
                        7.4: B. Braun
                        7.5: Golden Stapler
                        7.6: Pride Medical Equipment
                        7.7: Double Medical Technology
                        7.8: Jiangsu Anno
                        7.9: Dongfeng Yihe
                        7.10: Portoria Medical
.

Buy full report or by chapter as follows

Limited Time offer

Price by License Type:
[-] Hide Chapter Details
[Chapter Number] [Chapter Name] [Chapter Number Of Pages] [Chapter Price]
Title/Chapter Name Pages Price
Full Report: Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Report: Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis to 2031 Full Report $ 2,990
A 150 Page Report
Lucintel has been in the business of market research and management consulting since 2000 and has published over 1000 market intelligence reports in various markets / applications and served over 1,000 clients worldwide. This study is a culmination of four months of full-time effort performed by Lucintel's analyst team. The analysts used the following sources for the creation and completion of this valuable report:
  • In-depth interviews of the major players in this market
  • Detailed secondary research from competitors’ financial statements and published data 
  • Extensive searches of published works, market, and database information pertaining to industry news, company press releases, and customer intentions
  • A compilation of the experiences, judgments, and insights of Lucintel’s professionals, who have analyzed and tracked this market over the years.
Extensive research and interviews are conducted across the supply chain of this market to estimate market share, market size, trends, drivers, challenges, and forecasts. Below is a brief summary of the primary interviews that were conducted by job function for this report.
 
Thus, Lucintel compiles vast amounts of data from numerous sources, validates the integrity of that data, and performs a comprehensive analysis. Lucintel then organizes the data, its findings, and insights into a concise report designed to support the strategic decision-making process. The figure below is a graphical representation of Lucintel’s research process. 
 

Please sign in below to get report brochure - Minimally Invasive Fascial Closure Device Market Report.

At Lucintel, we respect your privacy and maintain the confidentiality of information / data provided by you
(Please enter your corporate email. * These fields are mandatory )

Follow us on