Close Lucintel Chat
Didn't Find What You're Looking for?
Call us at +1972 636 5056 or write at helpdesk@Lucintel.com
Ask an Expert Provide Custom Requirements Download Sample Report Search Available Reports
  • helpdesk@Lucintel.com
  • |
  • Call Lucintel +1 972 636 5056
  • |
  • Login
  • |
  • Register
  • |
  • Search
  • |
'
...

Request the impact of COVID-19 in this market at no additional cost. Buy it today to get an advantage.

Request Now


The global oil and gas well completion and production industry experienced robust growth over the last five years and is expected to reach approximately US $177.6 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 7.3% over the next five years. Companies in the industry have embraced technology-driven products, services and system strategies, and the

top players use their own sales and marketing channels to serve the market in most cases.

Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas well completion and production companies and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.” The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five companies. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group, and in which areas, and therefore clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of companies covered.

As indicated in the study, the global oil and gas well completion and production industry reached an estimated $115.5 billion in 2011, growing at a CAGR of 13.8% during the last five years. The industry is fragmented. The Rest of the World region dominates this market and represents 32.2% of the global market. A combination of factors such as strong oil prices and higher customer spending is seen to affect market dynamics significantly. In this study, Lucintel profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:    
    
  • Baker Hughes Inc.                                    
  • Halliburton                                 
  • National Oilwell Varco Inc.                
  • Schlumberger Ltd.                   
  • Weatherford International Ltd.            
                                    
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the world’s top five oil and gas well completion and production companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.

Oil and gas well completion and production market report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global oil and gas well completion and production companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business

In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's oil and gas well completion and production companies, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
 
  • Baker Hughes Inc.                                    
  • Halliburton                                 
  • National Oilwell Varco Inc.                
  • Schlumberger Ltd.                   
  • Weatherford International Ltd.  

The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
 
  • Company overview          
  • Benchmarking (financial & market)
  • SWOT analysis         
  • Product positioning
  • Marketing strategy and tactics    
  • Corporate strategy

To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. Oil and gas well completion and production market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing with oil and gas well completion and production companies industry.

Some of the features of Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis market intelligence report are:
 
  • Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the global oil and gas well completion and production companies
  • Regional analysis: global oil and gas well completion and production companies breakdown by key regions (e.g., North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
  • Market trends, drivers and forecasts
  • Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
  • Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
  • Product line overview and positioning of top players
  • Marketing strategy and tactics    
  • Corporate strategy
  • More than 108 valuable figures/charts and 45 tables are provided in this report
 
 1. Executive Summary  

 2. Market Definition and Scope  

 3. Market Opportunity  

 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)  

 5. Company Profile on Following Parameters  

 6. Profiles on Following Companies  
 6.1. Baker Hughes Inc  
 6.2. Halliburton  
 6.3. National Oilwell Varco Inc  
 6.4. Schlumberger Ltd  
 6.5. Weatherford International Ltd  

List of Figures
 
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas well completion and production market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry opportunity by region
        
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas well completion and production companies – financial   benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas well completion and production companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011  
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
 
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.1: Baker Hughes Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Baker Hughes Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9:   APAC industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Baker Hughes Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players   average 2011
Figure 5.18: Baker Hughes Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Baker Hughes Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 6.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Halliburton SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Halliburton productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Halliburton fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.1: National Oilwell Varco Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco Inc. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: National Oilwell Varco Inc. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: National Oilwell Varco Inc. fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Schlumberger Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Ltd. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Schlumberger Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Schlumberger Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.1: Weatherford International Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Weatherford International Ltd. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Weatherford International Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Weatherford International Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
 
 
 
 
List of Tables
 
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas well completion and production industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
 
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas well completion and production    companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas well completion and production   companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
 
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.1:  Market served: Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.2:  Lucintel triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.3:  Financial Benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4:  Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5:  Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6:  Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7:  Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton  
Table 6.1: Market served – Halliburton  
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton  
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
.

Buy full report or by chapter as follows

Price by License Type:
[-] Hide Chapter Details
[Chapter Number] [Chapter Name] [Chapter Number Of Pages] [Chapter Price]
Title/Chapter Name Pages Price
Full Report: Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis, Full Report $ 1,980
More than 18 figures/charts and 12 tables are provided in this roughly 60 page report
Lucintel has been in the business of market research and management consulting since 2000 and has published over 1000 market intelligence reports in various markets / applications and served over 1,000 clients worldwide. This study is a culmination of four months of full-time effort performed by Lucintel's analyst team. The analysts used the following sources for the creation and completion of this valuable report:
  • In-depth interviews of the major players in this market
  • Detailed secondary research from competitors’ financial statements and published data 
  • Extensive searches of published works, market, and database information pertaining to industry news, company press releases, and customer intentions
  • A compilation of the experiences, judgments, and insights of Lucintel’s professionals, who have analyzed and tracked this market over the years.
Extensive research and interviews are conducted across the supply chain of this market to estimate market share, market size, trends, drivers, challenges, and forecasts. Below is a brief summary of the primary interviews that were conducted by job function for this report.
 
Thus, Lucintel compiles vast amounts of data from numerous sources, validates the integrity of that data, and performs a comprehensive analysis. Lucintel then organizes the data, its findings, and insights into a concise report designed to support the strategic decision-making process. The figure below is a graphical representation of Lucintel’s research process.