• helpdesk@Lucintel.com
  • |
  • +1 972 636 5056
  • |
  • Login
  • |
  • Register
  • |
...

Request the impact of COVID-19 in this market at no additional cost. Buy it today to get an advantage.

Request Now


The global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry is a segment of the global oil and gas field equipment and services industry. Both industries, which have witnessed high growth in recent years, are expected to continue their growth momentum. The oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry is estimated

to reach $202.4 billion by 2017, growing at a CAGR of 8.3%.

Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.” This report briefly discusses the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and provides a SWOT analysis of each.

The industry has encountered serious threats from domestic and international regulations along with political and environmental matters. Due to various rules and regulation compliance issues, companies in the industry have had to incur additional expenses. Rapid declines in cash reserves of the industry due to increased capital expenditure and increased payables have affected the industry in financing its operations.

Lucintel’s report provides a concise overview of the main drivers of the industry. Rising opportunities in deep-water exploration and production activities, with an expectation of the majority of natural gas and oil production to be from offshore platforms accelerates industry growth. Another reason for growth has been the strategic acquisitions and alliances forged to expand global reach and a product portfolio that caters to the changing demand of the customers.

The report covers the top five global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies:
 
  • Cameron International
  • National Oilwell Varco
  • Saipem S.p.A.  
  • Subsea 7 S.A.
  • Technip.                               

Oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
 
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:  
                     
  • Cameron International Corp.         
  • National Oilwell Varco Inc.
  • Saipem S.p.A.                        
  • Subsea 7 S.A.    
  • Technip

The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
 
  • Company overview          
  • Benchmarking (financial & market)
  • SWOT analysis         
  • Product positioning
  • Marketing strategy and tactics    
  • Corporate strategy

To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. Oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing with oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies industry.

Some of the features of Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis market intelligence report are:
 
  • Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies
  • Regional analysis: global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies breakdown by key regions (e.g., North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
  • Market trends, drivers and forecasts
  • Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
  • Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
  • Product line overview and positioning of top players
  • SWOT analysis of the leaders
  • Marketing strategy and tactics    
  • Corporate strategy
  • More than 110 valuable figures/charts and 44 tables are provided in this report
     
 1. Executive Summary  

 2. Market Definition and Scope  

 3. Market Opportunity  

 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)  

 5. Company Profile on Following Parameters  

 6. Profiles on Following Companies  
 6.1. Cameron International Corp  
 6.2. National Oilwell Varco Inc  
 6.3. Saipem SpA  
 6.4. Subsea 7 SA  
 6.5. Technip  

List of Figures
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry opportunity by region
 
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011  
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
 
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Cameron International
Figure 5.1: Cameron International’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Cameron International
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Cameron International against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Cameron International against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Cameron International (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Cameron International 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Cameron International trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Cameron International trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Cameron International SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Cameron International productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Cameron International fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco
Figure 6.1: National Oilwell Varco revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - National Oilwell Varco
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: National Oilwell Varco trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.12: National Oilwell Varco trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.13: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.14: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.16: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.17: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.18: National Oilwell Varco productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: National Oilwell Varco fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.
Figure 7.1: Saipem S.p.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Saipem S.p.A.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Saipem S.p.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: Saipem S.p.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Saipem S.p.A. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Saipem S.p.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Saipem S.p.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Subsea 7 S.A.
Figure 8.1: Subsea 7 S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Subsea 7 S.A.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Subsea 7 S.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Subsea 7 S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Subsea 7 S.A. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Subsea 7 S.A. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Subsea 7 S.A. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Subsea 7 S.A. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
 
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Technip
Figure 9.1: Technip revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Technip
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Technip against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Technip against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Technip (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Technip (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Technip trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Technip trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Technip SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Technip productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Technip fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
 
 
List of Table
 
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
 
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas field equipment and infrastructure companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
 
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Cameron International
Table 5.1:  Market served: Cameron International
Table 5.2:  Lucintel triad – Cameron International
Table 5.3:  Financial Benchmarking of Cameron International against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4:  Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5:  Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6:  Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7:  Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco
Table 6.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.
Table 7.1: Market served – Saipem S.p.A.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Saipem S.p.A.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A.  against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Subsea 7 S.A.
Table 8.1: Market served – Subsea 7 S.A.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Subsea 7 S.A.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Subsea 7 S.A. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Technip
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Technip
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Technip
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Technip against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
 
.

Buy full report or by chapter as follows

Price by License Type:
[-] Hide Chapter Details
[Chapter Number] [Chapter Name] [Chapter Number Of Pages] [Chapter Price]
Title/Chapter Name Pages Price
Full Report: Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies Analysis Full Report $ 1,980
More than 110 valuable figures/charts and 44 tables are provided in this report
 
Lucintel has been in the business of market research and management consulting since 2000 and has published over 600 market intelligence reports in various markets / applications and served 1,000+ clients worldwide. This study is a culmination of four months of full-time effort performed by Lucintel's analyst team. The analysts used the following sources for the creation and completion of this valuable report:
  • In-depth interviews of the major players in this market
  • Detailed secondary research from competitors’ financial statements and published data
  • Extensive search of published works, market and database information with industry news, company press releases, and customer intentions
  • A compilation of the experiences, judgments, and insights of Lucintel’s professionals, who have analyzed and tracked this market over the years.
Extensive research and interviews are conducted in the supply chain of this market to estimate market share, market size, trends, drivers, challenges and forecasts in the market. Below is a brief summary of primary interviews conducted by both job function and region.


Thus, Lucintel compiles vast amounts of data from numerous sources, validates the integrity of that data, and performs a comprehensive analysis on it. Lucintel then organizes the data, its findings, and insights into a concise report designed to support the strategic decision-making process. The figure below is a graphical representation of the Lucintel research process.

 

Please sign in below to get report brochure - Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Infrastructure Companies Analysis.

At Lucintel, we respect your privacy and maintain the confidentiality of information / data provided by you
(Please enter your corporate email. * These fields are mandatory )