Close Lucintel Chat
Didn't Find What You're Looking for?
Call us at +1972 636 5056 or write at helpdesk@Lucintel.com
Ask an Expert Provide Custom Requirements Download Sample Report Search Available Reports
  • helpdesk@Lucintel.com
  • |
  • Call Lucintel +1 972 636 5056
  • |
  • Login
  • |
  • Register
  • |
  • Search
  • |
'
...

Request the impact of COVID-19 in this market at no additional cost. Buy it today to get an advantage.

Request Now


The global hair care products industry witnessed moderate growth during the last five years. The industry’s key players are adopting corporate and marketing strategies such as research and innovation strategies in order to compete in this highly consolidated industry and develop various beauty care solutions customized for c

onsumers in different regions of the world.

The report analyzes the industry’s major drivers. Strong brand recognition enables the industry to increase customer base and market share due to strong marketing and advertising strategies. Increased demand for innovative products in the US provides an opportunity to the key players to gain profitability by leveraging their brand and global presence.

A total of 108 figures / charts and 45 tables are provided in this report to help in your business decisions. Sample figures with some insights are shown below. To learn the scope of, benefits, companies researched and other details of the hair care product  market competitive analysis report, download the report brochure.



This study provides industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the world’s top five hair care product manufacturers companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and business strategies of the leaders. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.

Increasing demand in the emerging countries of the Rest of the World and Asia Pacific regions due to population growth and greater disposable income has bolstered the industry’s growth.

Lucintel’s study indicates that growing demand for private label products and intense competition can reduce the sales volume and hamper the global market as well as the total revenue of the industry. The global economic slowdown and vague recovery scenarios are likely to create challenges for the industry over the next few years.

The study gives a brief overview of the top global hair care manufacturers:

•    Colgate-Palmolive
•    Henkel AG & Co KGaA
•    L’Oreal S.A.
•    The Procter & Gamble Company
•    Unilever PLC

Hair care product market competitive analysis report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global hair care product manufacturers companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.

In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's hair care product manufacturers, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:   
                                            
•    Colgate-Palmolive
•    Henkel AG & Co KGaA
•    L’Oreal S.A.
•    The Procter & Gamble Company
•    Unilever PLC
               
The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:

•    Company overview          
•    Benchmarking (financial & market)
•    SWOT analysis         
•    Product positioning
•    Marketing strategy and tactics    
•    Corporate strategy

To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. This market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing with hair care product manufacturers companies industry.

Some of the features of  Top Five Global Hair Care Product Manufacturers: Performance, Strategies and Competitive Analysis market intelligence report are:
 
  • Hair care product competitive analysis market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the global hair care product manufacturers companies
  • Regional analysis: global hair care product manufacturers companies breakdown by key regions (e.g., North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
  • Hair care product competitive analysis market trends, drivers and forecasts
  • Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
  • Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
  • Product line overview and positioning of top players
  • SWOT analysis of the leaders
  • Marketing strategy and tactics    
  • Corporate strategy
  • More than 108 valuable figures/charts and 45 tables are provided in this report
     

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity   
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
  • Company Overview          
  • Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
  • SWOT Analysis         
  • Product Positioning
  • Marketing Strategy and Tactics    
  • Corporate Strategy             
List of Figures

Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for hair care product manufacturers market
Figure 3.2: Global hair care product manufacturers industry annual trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global hair care product manufacturers industry regional trend 2007-2012 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global hair care product manufacturers industry segment trend 2007-2012 (US $B)
Figure 3.7: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global hair care product manufacturers industry opportunity by segment

Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five hair care product manufacturers companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five hair care product manufacturers companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2012
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2012)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2007
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2012
Figure 4.6: 2007 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2012
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2012  
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2012 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2008-2012 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players

Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.1: Colgate-Palmolive’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Colgate-Palmolive against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Colgate-Palmolive (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9:  APAC industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Colgate-Palmolive 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 5.16: Colgate-Palmolive trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Colgate-Palmolive R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Colgate-Palmolive productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Colgate-Palmolive fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution

Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.1: Henkel AG & Co KGaA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Henkel AG & Co KGaA (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Henkel AG & Co KGaA 2008-2012 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Henkel AG & Co KGaA trend in R&D expenses Percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Henkel AG & Co KGaA R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Henkel AG & Co KGaA productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Henkel AG & Co KGaA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution

Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.1: L’Oreal S.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. l (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs L’Oreal S.A. (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 7.15: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 7.16: L’Oreal S.A. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of L’Oreal S.A. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: L’Oreal S.A.productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: L’Oreal S.A.fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution

Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.1: The Procter & Gamble Company revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs The Procter & Gamble Company (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 8.15: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 8.16: The Procter & Gamble Company trend in R&D expenses percentage of totalrevenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: The Procter & Gamble Company productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: The Procter & Gamble Company fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution

Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Figure 9.1: Unilever PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Unilever PLC against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Unilever PLC (2008-2012) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses 2008-2012 in US $M
Figure 9.16: Unilever PLC trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Unilever PLC R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Unilever PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Unilever PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution

List of Tables

Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global hair care product manufacturers industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.3: Segment revenue growth rate

Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five hair care product manufacturers companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players

Chapter 5. Company Profile of Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.1:  Market served: Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.2:  Lucintel triad – Colgate-Palmolive
Table 5.3:  Financial Benchmarking of Colgate-Palmolive against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4:  Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5:  Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6:  Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7:  Strategic execution – product distribution by region

Chapter 6. Company Profile of Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.1: Market served – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Henkel AG & Co KGaA
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Henkel AG & Co KGaA against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

Chapter 7. Company Profile of L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.1: Market served – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – L’Oreal S.A.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of L’Oreal S.A. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

Chapter 8. Company Profile of The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.1: Market served – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – The Procter & Gamble Company
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of The Procter & Gamble Company against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region

Chapter 9. Company Profile of Unilever PLC
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Unilever PLC
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Unilever PLC
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Unilever PLC against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
.

Buy full report or by chapter as follows

Price by License Type:
[-] Hide Chapter Details
[Chapter Number] [Chapter Name] [Chapter Number Of Pages] [Chapter Price]
Title/Chapter Name Pages Price
Full Report: Hair Care Product Manufacturing Companies Analysis Full Report $ 1,980
More than 108 valuable figures/charts and 45 tables are provided in this report
Lucintel has been in the business of market research and management consulting since 2000 and has published over 1000 market intelligence reports in various markets / applications and served over 1,000 clients worldwide. This study is a culmination of four months of full-time effort performed by Lucintel's analyst team. The analysts used the following sources for the creation and completion of this valuable report:
  • In-depth interviews of the major players in this market
  • Detailed secondary research from competitors’ financial statements and published data 
  • Extensive searches of published works, market, and database information pertaining to industry news, company press releases, and customer intentions
  • A compilation of the experiences, judgments, and insights of Lucintel’s professionals, who have analyzed and tracked this market over the years.
Extensive research and interviews are conducted across the supply chain of this market to estimate market share, market size, trends, drivers, challenges, and forecasts. Below is a brief summary of the primary interviews that were conducted by job function for this report.
 
Thus, Lucintel compiles vast amounts of data from numerous sources, validates the integrity of that data, and performs a comprehensive analysis. Lucintel then organizes the data, its findings, and insights into a concise report designed to support the strategic decision-making process. The figure below is a graphical representation of Lucintel’s research process.