Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
5. Company Profile on Following Parameters
6. Profiles on Following Companies
6.1. AP Moeller Maersk A S
6.2. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
6.3. Kuehne Nagel Inc
6.4. Mitsui O S K Lines Ltd
6.5. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
List of Figures
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for Marine freight transportation service market
Figure 3.2: Global marine freight transportation service industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global marine freight transportation service industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global marine freight transportation service industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global marine freight transportation service industry opportunity by region
Chapter 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five marine freight transportation service companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five marine freight transportation service companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of AP Moeller-Maersk A/S
Figure 5.1: AP Moeller-Maersk A/S’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – AP Moeller-Maersk A/S
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking AP Moeller-Maersk A/S against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of AP Moeller-Maersk A/S against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for AP Moeller-Maersk A/S (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs AP Moeller-Maersk A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: AP Moeller-Maersk A/S productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.16: AP Moeller-Maersk A/S fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.17: Strategic execution
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
Figure 6.1: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.16: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.17: Strategic execution
Chapter 7. Company Profile of Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Figure 7.1: Kuehne + Nagel Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Kuehne + Nagel Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Kuehne + Nagel Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Kuehne + Nagel Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.16: Kuehne + Nagel Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.17: Strategic execution
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.16: Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.17: Strategic execution
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Figure 9.1: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.16: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.17: Strategic execution
List of Tables
Chapter 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global marine freight transportation service industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Chapter 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global marine freight transportation service companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five marine freight transportation service companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
Chapter 5. Company Profile of AP Moeller-Maersk A/S
Table 5.1: Market served: AP Moeller-Maersk A/S
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – AP Moeller-Maersk A/S
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of AP Moeller-Maersk A/S against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 6. Company Profile of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
Table 6.1: Market served – Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 7. Company Profile of Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Kuehne + Nagel Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 8. Company Profile of Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
Chapter 9. Company Profile of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region